Why Clemson and The Citadel Rejected 10-Minute Quarters in Football Game
During a non-conference football matchup between Clemson and The Citadel, an unexpected pre-game proposal sparked discussion among fans and analysts: the possibility of shortening the game by reducing the length of quarters from the standard 15 minutes to 10 minutes. While such adjustments are rare, they are sometimes suggested in matchups with significant talent disparities to help prevent injuries and manage the clock more effectively. Both teams, however, declined the idea, keeping the game at the regulation length. Here’s why.
1. Commitment to Competition
For Clemson, a program with national championship aspirations, sticking to the traditional format was essential to maintaining game integrity. Head Coach Dabo Swinney emphasized the importance of every quarter in evaluating players and fine-tuning strategies, especially against lower-division teams like The Citadel. Shortened quarters could limit opportunities for second- and third-string players to gain experience in live-game situations.
The Citadel, despite being an FCS team, also prioritized the full-length format. Head Coach Maurice Drayton noted that the experience of playing a complete game against a top-tier program was invaluable for his players. Adjusting the format might detract from the learning and growth opportunities such matchups provide.
2. Respect for the Fans
Both programs acknowledged the expectations of fans and stakeholders. Clemson Memorial Stadium, known as “Death Valley,” boasts one of the most passionate fanbases in college football. A shortened game might be perceived as a lesser experience for the tens of thousands who paid to attend.
Similarly, The Citadel wanted to honor its traveling supporters by playing a full game. “Our alumni and fans come to see our team give it their all for 60 minutes, no matter the opponent,” said Drayton.
3. Competitive Spirit
Adjusting the rules could have been seen as diminishing the competitive spirit of the game. Clemson, despite being a heavy favorite, wanted to respect The Citadel by playing a complete game rather than implying a mercy-rule scenario.
Past Precedents
Shortened games are typically agreed upon only in extreme circumstances, such as weather delays, lopsided halftime scores, or mutual agreement between teams. However, the NCAA requires that such decisions be made collaboratively, with both teams and officials in agreement.
Outcome of the Game
The full-length quarters ultimately allowed both teams to play to their potential, with Clemson showcasing its depth and The Citadel gaining valuable experience. While the result was a predictable Clemson victory, the game served as a meaningful contest for both programs.
This decision underscored the shared values of competition, respect, and commitment to the game that define college football at every level.
Leave a Reply